Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tim Gray (technology journalist)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. WjBscribe 23:00, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Tim Gray (technology journalist) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Contested prod. Author almost certainly has a WP:COI, and in any case he doesn't seem to be notable. A Google search was inconclusive. YechielMan 17:10, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and give a chance for further research and evidence to be added to indicate notability and references. --164.107.223.217 21:03, 29 April 2007 (UTC)(infeblocked user). BigHaz - Schreit mich an 06:26, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]- Comment This anonymous user has voted Keep in every AfD he's voted in. JuJube 00:23, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, WjBscribe 02:07, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, reasonably successful technology journalist but accomplishment != notability. No third party sources attesting to same. --Dhartung | Talk 03:27, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No notability. Wouldn't you think a reporter would have sources? JodyB talk 18:53, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.